{"id":31997,"date":"2022-09-16T14:57:06","date_gmt":"2022-09-16T14:57:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/caseyfamilyv2.wpengine.com\/shutdown-surveillance-study-2\/"},"modified":"2026-08-03T20:50:47","modified_gmt":"2026-08-03T20:50:47","slug":"estudio-de-vigilancia-del-cierre","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.casey.org\/es\/shutdown-surveillance-study\/","title":{"rendered":"\u00bfLimitar la vigilancia gubernamental pone en peligro la seguridad de los ni\u00f1os?"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n\n \n \n \n \n

This summary synthesizes findings from a single research study, An unintended abolition: Family regulation during the Covid-19 crisis<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

\n
\n\n \n

What can we learn from this study?<\/h2>\n \n \n \n

<\/p>\n

The near-total lockdown during the first three months of the COVID-19 pandemic forced New York City’s child welfare system to curtail or modify many activities. School closures meant teachers were not making as many calls to the hotline. Investigation protocols were adjusted to be less intrusive and prioritize only the highest risk cases, with the family court system focusing on cases with imminent risk of physical or emotional harm. At the same time, a rise in mutual-aid projects and the availability of unrestricted cash assistance through the CARES Act gave families access to critical and flexible support in their own communities. Taken together, these circumstances created a unique opportunity to understand the implications of limited government surveillance on child safety.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

\n
\n\n \n

Study details<\/h2>\n \n \n \n