Este resumen sintetiza los hallazgos de un único estudio de investigación, Vigilancia familiar: La policía y la denuncia de maltrato y negligencia infantil.
¿Qué podemos aprender de este estudio?
Child protection agencies are reactive by design, relying on mandatory reporters and public citizens to report concerns about child maltreatment. In 2015, police made 20% of reports to child protection hotlines (nearly 400,000). Given the relationship between law enforcement and child protection, the inequitable distribution of policing in communities across the country also has important consequences within the child welfare system. This research study seeks to understand the extent of these inequities.
Detalles del estudio
- Población: reports of child maltreatment screened-in for an investigation or assessment
- Fuente de datos: National Child Abuse and Neglect Data System (NCANDS); Uniform Crime Reports (UCR) arrests by age, sex, and race
- Metodología: descriptive analysis; multilevel regression models
- Fechas: 2009 to 2015
Cita Edwards, F. (2019). Family surveillance: Police and the reporting of child abuse and neglect. RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, 5(1), 50-70.
¿Cuáles son las conclusiones críticas?
The extent of police involvement in communities is not randomly or equitably distributed, and exposure to policing plays a role in determining which children come into contact with child protection agencies. More specifically:
- Children involved in a report of maltreatment made by law enforcement are more likely to be confirmed as victims of abuse or neglect (39%) compared to reports from other sources (22%).
- Black children were subject to nearly two times more police-initiated maltreatment investigations compared to white children (9.7 per 1,000 compared to 5.1 per 1,000).
- Between 2002 and 2015, the rate of police reporting of maltreatment increased 60% for Black families, 23% for Latinx families, and 39% for white families.
- Arrest rates are positively and significantly associated with rates of police reporting of maltreatment.
- Both the composition of the population and the nature of policing in a community more powerfully explain the intensity of family surveillance than child poverty.
Although these results suggest that involvement with the child protection system may be a consequence of arrest for any charge, further research is needed to more thoroughly investigate whether there is a causal relationship between police contact with families and the reporting of child abuse and neglect.
¿Por qué es importante para nuestro trabajo?
A child protection agency’s reliance on other systems to surveil families and report abuse and neglect further exacerbates existing biases present in those systems, including law enforcement, and has resulted in an inefficient and often inaccurate system for identifying when children are at serious risk of harm. These implications must be clearly understood and mitigated.
Casey Family Programs consulta con individuos y equipos en todo el país para recopilar investigaciones, experiencias y conocimientos sobre enfoques que pueden reducir de manera segura la necesidad de acogida familiar y garantizar el bienestar de los niños y las familias. Compartimos esta información ampliamente para ayudar a los líderes de bienestar infantil y a sus socios a abordar problemas similares en sus propias comunidades. Para preguntas sobre este recurso, o si tiene otras necesidades de información sobre bienestar infantil, envíe un correo electrónico a kmresources@casey.org.