Both domestic violence and parental substance misuse are overrepresented among families involved with child welfare. This study assessed how caseworkers’ perceptions of domestic violence and parental substance misuse influenced their decision to substantiate in cases where these experiences were not linked to the reported maltreatment.
Study details
Population: 501,060 allegations from 122,658 first-time investigations of child maltreatment in which the allegation did not include domestic violence or substance misuse
Data source: Administrative records from a large Midwestern child welfare agency
Methodology: Multilevel modeling
Dates: Decisions made between 2009 and 2013
Citation: Victor, B. G., Grogan-Kaylor, A., Ryan, J. P., Perron, B. E., & Gilbert, T. T. (2018). Domestic violence, parental substance misuse and the decision to substantiate child maltreatment. Child Abuse & Neglect, 79, 31-41.
What are the critical findings?
Identification of parental substance misuse alone increased the probability of substantiation by 150%, while identification of domestic violence alone increased the probability of substantiation by 50%.
Co-identification of domestic violence and parental substance misuse increased the probability of substantiation by nearly 200%.
Results suggest that caseworkers are most influenced by parental substance misuse when making the decision to substantiate an allegation of maltreatment unrelated to either behavior.
Predicted probability of substantiation
by type of risk factor(s) identified
Why is this important for our work?
States may find that it is more efficient and cost effective to develop public health models of intervention for families experiencing domestic violence or substance use to avoid formal entry into the child welfare system. In addition, it may be important to understand the extent to which caseworkers use other allegation types as a proxy to substantiate parental substance use or exposure to domestic violence in cases when those behaviors are not linked to the maltreatment allegation. In these cases, targeted training of caseworkers may be necessary.
Casey Family Programs consults with individuals and teams across the country to compile research, experiences, and insights about approaches that can safely reduce the need for foster care and ensure the well-being of children and families. We share this information broadly to help child welfare leaders and their partners tackle similar issues in their own communities. For questions about this resource, or if you have other child welfare information needs, please email kmresources@casey.org.
Both domestic violence and parental substance misuse are overrepresented among families involved with child welfare. This study assessed how caseworkers’ perceptions of domestic violence and parental substance misuse influenced their decision to substantiate in cases where these experiences were not linked to the reported maltreatment.
Study details
Population: 501,060 allegations from 122,658 first-time investigations of child maltreatment in which the allegation did not include domestic violence or substance misuse
Data source: Administrative records from a large Midwestern child welfare agency
Methodology: Multilevel modeling
Dates: Decisions made between 2009 and 2013
Citation: Victor, B. G., Grogan-Kaylor, A., Ryan, J. P., Perron, B. E., & Gilbert, T. T. (2018). Domestic violence, parental substance misuse and the decision to substantiate child maltreatment. Child Abuse & Neglect, 79, 31-41.
What are the critical findings?
Identification of parental substance misuse alone increased the probability of substantiation by 150%, while identification of domestic violence alone increased the probability of substantiation by 50%.
Co-identification of domestic violence and parental substance misuse increased the probability of substantiation by nearly 200%.
Results suggest that caseworkers are most influenced by parental substance misuse when making the decision to substantiate an allegation of maltreatment unrelated to either behavior.
Predicted probability of substantiation
by type of risk factor(s) identified
Why is this important for our work?
States may find that it is more efficient and cost effective to develop public health models of intervention for families experiencing domestic violence or substance use to avoid formal entry into the child welfare system. In addition, it may be important to understand the extent to which caseworkers use other allegation types as a proxy to substantiate parental substance use or exposure to domestic violence in cases when those behaviors are not linked to the maltreatment allegation. In these cases, targeted training of caseworkers may be necessary.
Casey Family Programs consults with individuals and teams across the country to compile research, experiences, and insights about approaches that can safely reduce the need for foster care and ensure the well-being of children and families. We share this information broadly to help child welfare leaders and their partners tackle similar issues in their own communities. For questions about this resource, or if you have other child welfare information needs, please email kmresources@casey.org.
